Motoring Offences Don’t Always Mean Heavy Penalties

There are lots of laws and regulations ruling all facets of motoring, and due to the multitudinous dangers associated with driving a car, they are rigorously ensured. Penalties for contravening certain motoring laws are severe and can bring about a prison sentence occasionally. Generally there are, however, ways and means of circumnavigating the law to stay away from the full penalty for committing accidents. Three examples are defined below: more information

Use of a Mobile Phone While Traveling

Since December 2003 it has been a legal offence to use a cellphone whilst driving unless run via a hands-free device. As this law has been in place for more than six years it is currently almost universally acknowledged and accepted. That does not however stop this law from being regularly contravened. Even though the law stipulates that it is an offence to make or obtain a telecommunication whilst utilizing a portable telephone whilst driving, there are somewhat grey areas with regard to the legality of by using a mobile phone in a way other than to speak whilst driving: as exemplified in the Jimmy Carr case (where his mobile phone was legally used while driving as a dictation device! ) There can often be uncertainty as to what amounts to a ‘telecommunication’ or when a phone is actually ‘hand held’. Similarly other exceptions to what the law states are present in situations deemed ’emergencies’. Unless the driver accepts the fact the offence, it is often difficult for the police to prove that the motorist was keeping a phone, as compared to an iPod, a Bluetooth earpiece or, in one recent case, a black pudding! 

Speeding

Rate cameras are the skinnelegeme of several a motorist’s life. Their unscrupulous and unforgiving capture of those exploring mere single digit installments above the stipulated rate limit is in charge of the issue of multiple hundreds of thousands of pounds worth of fines annually. Speed digital cameras are which may reduce the incidence of accidents in many circumstances and in the same way help to generally prevent motorists from exceeding velocity limits. Conversely, the process undertaken from the show of the camera through to the issuing of a penalty notice is quite convoluted and on several of occasions standard protocol is deviated from, thus rendering the demand invalid if contested. Right now there are around 50 different types of speed camera, including radar and laser beam devices, and all have detailed rules regulating the way they should be operated. A breach of these guidelines by the police can invalidate the velocity reading.

Drink Driving

Preventing drink driving has been a priority for the capabilities that be for many years. The diminished reactions and concentration synonymous with inebriation have been accountable for many accidents, casualties and deaths. As a result of the severity of the offence, the rules is very strict on those found guilty and a driving ban is a highly probable summary to being found accountable. As with the circumstance of motorists charged with speed camera offences, the procedure involved for recharging a motorist with drink driving offences is filled with red tape. Via inconsistencies on the part of the charging police officer, through to lack of lucidity in results or the provision of data, an initial charge of alcohol related motoring accidents does not necessarily lead to a conviction.